Tamron AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro Zoom Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras

Tamron AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro Zoom Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras – Product Description:

Tamron Tamron AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro Zoom Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras

Product Features :

  • Since the lens is designed exclusively for digital SLR photography, it provides high image quality in terms of resolution
  • It employs a new optical system designed to confine the changing angles of incidences of light rays reaching the imager over the entire image field.
  • Peripheral light fall-off is minimized when compared with that of conventional lenses
  • Complicated mechanisms are built in the compact body thanks to new mechanical artifices. The lens is a multi-purpose zoom lens,excellent portability
  • The Zoom Lock prevents unwanted barrel extension when carrying the lens/camera combination

Tamron AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro Zoom Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras – Review:

GOOD VALUE – USEFUL ALL-IN-ONE LENS!

Like a baseball player with a decent batting average, some power, a little bit of speed and fairly good fielding ability, the Tamron 18-200 lens won’t be an All-Star any time soon because it does not excel at any one thing. But, like that $500k/year utility infielder, this lens DOES provide a very good all-around value for what it is. Does it compare to a prime lens at either end? Heck, no. Is it a good lens to use when you can’t carry a wide choice of lenses with you? Absolutely.

I’ve been using this lens on my 20D quite a bit and have only a few minor gripes: it tends to hunt for AF (especially as you get closer to 200mm), and it’s not the quietest lens I’ve used.

An earlier reviewer mentioned that it maxed out at about 160mm. My own analysis shows that it is short of 200mm, but not by that large an extent; I found it much closer to 190. Still, there’s no doubt that these zoom lenses with extreme ranges like this have a built-in fudge factor.

Another reviewer described the problems he encountered when using two screw-on filters. There aren’t too many primes that I’ve used that will avoid vignetting when using two filters. Heck, my 10-22 can barely handle one extra-slim. As for darkening the image – well, you’re adding two more pieces of glass to a highly-complex lens assembly… just asking for trouble.

As for the concern regarding blur at longer focal lengths, I highly recommend the use of a tripod. I noticed the exact same thing – blur and lack of sharpness – at lengths over 100mm. Keep the old rule of thumb in mind – if you’re shooting handheld, your shutter speed should be no slower than the inverse of your focal length. A 200mm lens on a 20D (or Rebel XT for that matter), is an effective 320mm – I wouldn’t recommend shooting any slower than 1/500 at max zoom with this lens – UNLESS you’re using a tripod. When I mounted it firmly, I got great shots with no blur.

Keep in mind that you get what you pay for here: the convenience of a wide-angle, normal, and moderate telephoto lens in one piece. If you’re shooting professionally, or need absolutely perfect images, then carry the three or four lenses that this would otherwise replace in your bag. But if you want one easy-to-use, satisfactory lens, go for this one. It’s a jack-of-all-trades, ace-of-none kinda deal.

Comments

comments

Please Share if you find it Interesting

PinIt

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *